[pnpgm] Urgent vote needed

pnpgm pnpgm at comcast.net
Tue Sep 26 03:07:48 CEST 2017


Didn't know you were on my list :)
That's cool.  Good to have lurkers.
Always welcome to join game :)



At 07:40 PM 9/25/2017, Burton Choinski wrote:
>Oops, I mean not S+7.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Burton Choinski
><mailto:bchoinski at verizon.net>bchoinski at verizon.net
>
>
>
>
>>On Sep 25, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Burton Choinski 
>><<mailto:bchoinski at verizon.net>bchoinski at verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>In game terms, I would grow with the greater magic rules, no 
>>stacking.  If you have something that grants S+3 and C+2, and you 
>>get something els that give S+4, your final tally is S+4, C+2, not S+6
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Burton Choinski
>><mailto:bchoinski at verizon.net>bchoinski at verizon.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Sep 25, 2017, at 2:58 PM, David Sanders 
>>><<mailto:dasandersx at comcast.net>dasandersx at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>I vote do it per the rules.  One item. More than one and they cancel out.
>>>
>>>The one exception would be NMI...they would be unaffected by other 
>>>attribute effect items or other NMI.
>>>
>>>Dave
>>>
>>>Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>>>On Sep 25, 2017, at 11:22 AM, pnpgm 
>>>><<mailto:pnpgm at comcast.net>pnpgm at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>In Attribute Effect there is that one rule that no more than 2 
>>>>items allowed.
>>>>I do recall this rule from 80s.
>>>>But I didn't have as many players with magical toys.
>>>>It was all simple low level basic stuff.
>>>>Not this uber stuff.
>>>>
>>>>We have some with 4-5 items that add stats of same attribute.
>>>>
>>>>I wonder if I should pull back and use this rule.
>>>>
>>>>I don't like arbitary decisions.  So will le tyou guys decide.
>>>>Rule is ' no 2 items of this type used at same time'.
>>>>
>>>>I've kinda ignored it till now.
>>>>
>>>>But should the force be balanced?
>>>>
>>>>So need some votes from folks.
>>>>I'll let you guys decide.
>>>>
>>>>We have 6 active players
>>>>Arawn, Unali, Z, Kiet, Fremea, Dorhak
>>>>Mae, Mounath and Pyan are active per se but not as much.
>>>>
>>>>So what say you?
>>>>1. Ignore rule
>>>>2. Use it restrict it to 2 items
>>>>3. Restrict to 3
>>>>4. Restrict to 5 items
>>>>
>>>>Probably need 4 votes ot make decision if unclear
>>>>then will have to decide myself.
>>>>
>>>>This could be a radical change as many have toys that would cause 
>>>>havoc if htey lose them.
>>>>
>>>>But best to decide now before adventure starts.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>pnpgm mailing list
>>>><mailto:pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org>pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
>>>>http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>pnpgm mailing list
>>><mailto:pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org>pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
>>>http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>pnpgm mailing list
>><mailto:pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org>pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
>>http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
>
>_______________________________________________
>pnpgm mailing list
>pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
>http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.powersandperils.org/pipermail/pnpgm/attachments/20170925/a5e9e4d1/attachment.htm>


More information about the pnpgm mailing list