<html>
<body>
Didn't know you were on my list :)<br>
That's cool. Good to have lurkers. <br>
Always welcome to join game :)<br><br>
<br><br>
At 07:40 PM 9/25/2017, Burton Choinski wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Oops, I mean not S+7.<br><br>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Burton Choinski<br>
<a href="mailto:bchoinski@verizon.net">bchoinski@verizon.net</a><br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">On Sep 25, 2017, at 7:39 PM,
Burton Choinski
<<a href="mailto:bchoinski@verizon.net">bchoinski@verizon.net</a>>
wrote:<br><br>
In game terms, I would grow with the greater magic rules, no
stacking. If you have something that grants S+3 and C+2, and you
get something els that give S+4, your final tally is S+4, C+2, not
S+6<br><br>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Burton Choinski<br>
<a href="mailto:bchoinski@verizon.net">bchoinski@verizon.net</a><br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">On Sep 25, 2017, at 2:58 PM,
David Sanders
<<a href="mailto:dasandersx@comcast.net">dasandersx@comcast.net</a>
> wrote:<br><br>
I vote do it per the rules. One item. More than one and they cancel
out.<br><br>
The one exception would be NMI...they would be unaffected by other
attribute effect items or other NMI.<br><br>
Dave<br><br>
Sent from my iPad<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">On Sep 25, 2017, at 11:22 AM,
pnpgm <<a href="mailto:pnpgm@comcast.net">pnpgm@comcast.net</a>>
wrote:<br><br>
In Attribute Effect there is that one rule that no more than 2 items
allowed.<br>
I do recall this rule from 80s.<br>
But I didn't have as many players with magical toys.<br>
It was all simple low level basic stuff.<br>
Not this uber stuff.<br><br>
We have some with 4-5 items that add stats of same attribute.<br><br>
I wonder if I should pull back and use this rule.<br><br>
I don't like arbitary decisions. So will le tyou guys decide.<br>
Rule is ' no 2 items of this type used at same time'.<br><br>
I've kinda ignored it till now.<br><br>
But should the force be balanced?<br><br>
So need some votes from folks.<br>
I'll let you guys decide.<br><br>
We have 6 active players<br>
Arawn, Unali, Z, Kiet, Fremea, Dorhak<br>
Mae, Mounath and Pyan are active per se but not as much.<br><br>
So what say you?<br>
1. Ignore rule<br>
2. Use it restrict it to 2 items<br>
3. Restrict to 3<br>
4. Restrict to 5 items<br><br>
Probably need 4 votes ot make decision if unclear<br>
then will have to decide myself.<br><br>
This could be a radical change as many have toys that would cause havoc
if htey lose them.<br><br>
But best to decide now before adventure starts.<br><br>
<br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
pnpgm mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:pnpgm@list.powersandperils.org">
pnpgm@list.powersandperils.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm" eudora="autourl">
http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm</a>
</blockquote><br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
pnpgm mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:pnpgm@list.powersandperils.org">
pnpgm@list.powersandperils.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm" eudora="autourl">
http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm</a>
</blockquote><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
pnpgm mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:pnpgm@list.powersandperils.org">
pnpgm@list.powersandperils.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm" eudora="autourl">
http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm</a>
</blockquote><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
pnpgm mailing list<br>
pnpgm@list.powersandperils.org<br>
<a href="http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm" eudora="autourl">
http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm</a>
</blockquote></body>
</html>