[pnpgm] Urgent vote needed

David Sanders dasandersx at comcast.net
Tue Sep 26 04:29:59 CEST 2017


Yes!  Very welcome!  Come play with us!  Bring some friends.

Sent from my iPad

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 6:07 PM, pnpgm <pnpgm at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> Didn't know you were on my list :)
> That's cool.  Good to have lurkers.  
> Always welcome to join game :)
> 
> 
> 
> At 07:40 PM 9/25/2017, Burton Choinski wrote:
>> Oops, I mean not S+7.
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Burton Choinski
>> bchoinski at verizon.net
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 25, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Burton Choinski <bchoinski at verizon.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> In game terms, I would grow with the greater magic rules, no stacking.  If you have something that grants S+3 and C+2, and you get something els that give S+4, your final tally is S+4, C+2, not S+6
>>> 
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Burton Choinski
>>> bchoinski at verizon.net
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 25, 2017, at 2:58 PM, David Sanders <dasandersx at comcast.net > wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I vote do it per the rules.  One item. More than one and they cancel out.
>>>> 
>>>> The one exception would be NMI...they would be unaffected by other attribute effect items or other NMI.
>>>> 
>>>> Dave
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 25, 2017, at 11:22 AM, pnpgm <pnpgm at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> In Attribute Effect there is that one rule that no more than 2 items allowed.
>>>>> I do recall this rule from 80s.
>>>>> But I didn't have as many players with magical toys.
>>>>> It was all simple low level basic stuff.
>>>>> Not this uber stuff.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We have some with 4-5 items that add stats of same attribute.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I wonder if I should pull back and use this rule.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't like arbitary decisions.  So will le tyou guys decide.
>>>>> Rule is ' no 2 items of this type used at same time'.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've kinda ignored it till now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But should the force be balanced?
>>>>> 
>>>>> So need some votes from folks.
>>>>> I'll let you guys decide.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We have 6 active players
>>>>> Arawn, Unali, Z, Kiet, Fremea, Dorhak
>>>>> Mae, Mounath and Pyan are active per se but not as much.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So what say you?
>>>>> 1. Ignore rule
>>>>> 2. Use it restrict it to 2 items
>>>>> 3. Restrict to 3
>>>>> 4. Restrict to 5 items
>>>>> 
>>>>> Probably need 4 votes ot make decision if unclear
>>>>> then will have to decide myself.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This could be a radical change as many have toys that would cause havoc if htey lose them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But best to decide now before adventure starts.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> pnpgm mailing list
>>>>> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
>>>>> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> pnpgm mailing list
>>>> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
>>>> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pnpgm mailing list
>>> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
>>> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pnpgm mailing list
>> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
>> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
> _______________________________________________
> pnpgm mailing list
> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.powersandperils.org/pipermail/pnpgm/attachments/20170925/d24658af/attachment.htm>


More information about the pnpgm mailing list