[pnpgm] Gemstones

David Sanders dasandersx at comcast.net
Tue Jul 15 03:44:28 CEST 2014


Kiet smiles and says "I have no objection to the distribution given previously by Fremea.  As long as it's not yet permanent.  Which I believe is the case."

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 14, 2014, at 1:39 PM, John Haight <sang_real at msn.com> wrote:
> 
> Selling the Gems:
> 
>    I agree with Kiet's and think we should wait until after we've left this city before selling them. Ideally I'd say hold on to them and then we can improve them during IBT and pass them on to Kell or another merchant to sell during IBT. 
> 
>    Does anyone have any problems or thoughts on both of the suggestions? If not, I'm guessing both should be a go.
> 
> 
> Temporary Distribution:
> 
>    Cool but we might want to look at the list. This is as Scott has it currently listed although I've corrected Arawn's choice, moving it from Turquoise to Tourmaline.
> 
>    This leaves the Meteorite and the Tourmaline in contention. How do we want to negotiate this?   (If Kiet's first choice is the Tourmaline Arawn can go with the Ruby assuming it works as written against poison (MDV + 10))
> 
>    And it leaves out Raban, Kell and Will. Will, do you have any interest in carrying a stone?
> 
> 
> 
>                  Item               Claimed by
>                Meteorite  [1]    Z'leyra, Kiet
>                Ruby       [2]    Fremea
>                Diamond    [1]    Fremea
>                Turquoise  [2]    
>                Emerald    [1]    
>                Sapphire   [1]    Kiet
>                Tourmaline [1]    Kiet, Arawn
>                Toadstone  [1]    Unali
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> From: bonahoom at hotmail.com
> To: pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 23:46:51 -0600
> Subject: Re: [pnpgm] Gemstones
> 
> Fremea had already stated that it was temporary placement. Only until this whole mess was sorted out and then we would split the treasure properly.
> 
> As for all the extra gems, she would have trusted Z to make sure they are safe.
> 
> From: dasandersx at comcast.net
> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 22:37:58 -0400
> To: pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
> Subject: Re: [pnpgm] Gemstones
> 
> "Well, truthfully, I am concerned about who we would trust with this fortune if we all go off on separate little missions.  These stones, enhancible or not, are many of them unique and can be traced back to where we got them."
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Jul 13, 2014, at 7:39 PM, John Haight <sang_real at msn.com> wrote:
> 
>    As there's some discrepancy with the list I was just posing the question to Scott so we, both GM and PC's, can determine if we're all on the same page. 
>    But you're right about the group making a decision... so group, as Scott is prepared to add the gems to people's character sheets, are we looking at this as a permanent assignment or temporary?
> 
>    I'm voting for temporary at the moment but I'm flexible.
> 
> From: dasandersx at comcast.net
> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:46:35 -0400
> To: pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
> Subject: Re: [pnpgm] Gemstones
> 
> Don't ask him...ask your mates!  Role play it.  It's really up to us all anyway.
> 
> Dave/Kiet
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Jul 12, 2014, at 1:44 PM, John Haight <sang_real at msn.com> wrote:
> 
> Scott, as you mentioned adding the stones to character sheets are you treating the placement as permanent or temporary?
> 
> From: dasandersx at comcast.net
> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 23:22:19 -0400
> To: pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
> Subject: Re: [pnpgm] Gemstones
> 
> Kiet looks over to Arawn and says 'I don't care who uses the gems that are enhanced right now.  I care about who gets them when we divide shares permanently.  Some of these jewels can be worth fortunes by themselves, and multiple fortunes if enhanced.  I am just asking for a bit of balance in the total share values.  It might even be that the value of some of the enhancible gems exceeds what a share might be...and maybe whoever wants to claim it should compensate the group for it.  And for our little group to not be hasty."
> 
> "By Girra's burning balls!...those haven't even been enhanced yet!"
> 
> Kiet hears about the 'house' that Bogun built...or at least sent things to...and it does interest him.  He's just not sure he's up to it, as he his feeling somewhat drained (magically, anyway).  It's likely to be well guarded.  Still, one must crack a few eggs to make egg rolls.  He looks over to Z'lleyra and says "So, what do you think of that house...Boguns?  Is it worth exploring?  We might find more 'trail' than we have thus far,"
> 
> "Sometimes, too, people keep their most prized possessions close to home..."  Kiet's face lights up in a mischievous smile...
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Jul 11, 2014, at 12:52 PM, John Haight <sang_real at msn.com> wrote:
> 
> Gems:
> 
>    Since we're going with choices made by players, Arawn's first choice for gem is the Tourmaline (not the Turquoise as currently listed). His second choice, pending a response to a PM, is the Ruby.
> 
>    As this will place Arawn in contention with Kiet for the Tourmaline, Kiet how do you want to handle this? Is the Tourmaline a first choice for you (over the meteorite and sapphire)?
> 
> 
> 
> Gems to Jewelry:
> 
> 
> 
>    If the party ends up choosing to hold on to the gems for now so they can be improved through cutting Arawn is willing to work with Z'leyra on crafting them to help speed things up. However I imagine the largest profit would be gained by taking time selling them, probably during downtime with Kell serving as the seller. As such there would be little need to rush through crafting the better stones, at least while questing.
> 
>    Any thoughts on this?
> 
> 
>    Otherwise, if we end up selling them in bulk as originally planned Arawn would like a portion of his share in good quality tourmaline for future magical crafting purposes. Probably about 20% or so.
> 
>    (Just trying to help the group out if we hold on the gems for crafting - Arawn is more interested in practicing his Jeweler skill than the profit)
> _______________________________________________
> pnpgm mailing list
> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
> 
> _______________________________________________ pnpgm mailing list pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
> _______________________________________________
> pnpgm mailing list
> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
> 
> _______________________________________________ pnpgm mailing list pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
> _______________________________________________
> pnpgm mailing list
> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
> 
> _______________________________________________ pnpgm mailing list pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
> 
> _______________________________________________ pnpgm mailing list pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
> _______________________________________________
> pnpgm mailing list
> pnpgm at list.powersandperils.org
> http://www.powersandperils.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnpgm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.powersandperils.org/pipermail/pnpgm/attachments/20140714/d359f7b5/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the pnpgm mailing list