<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
The cost to increase a spell to the next EL is based on the new casting
cost and EL. If you look at the tables in the magic section, you'll
find that the numbers are consistant with that. i.e. as cost of 12 to
increase a Base Mana 1 spell from 0 to 1.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Albert Sales wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid20031125151630.44029.qmail@web80405.mail.yahoo.com">
<div><font face="arial">W+St... I like it. And I would still add in
CB cumulatively per check, a person's fortitude does help shake it off,
and this also helps to speed up the recovery. ... Right before I sent,
I had a consideration on this. If it is done as a problem-solving roll,
with the difficulty achieved determining amount recovered, that might
work (but I'll look at that with some figures another time).</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="arial">I also have a totally off topic
question: Poisons have an "Energy effect" ( <b><font size="2">2D1</font></b></font><font
face="arial"><font size="2">0+</font><b><font size="2">B</font></b></font><font
face="arial"><font size="2">L, energy points ) to determine if the
poison has accumulated enough to take effect even though failure is
rolled (it does so when EnL is reduced to or below zero by this
factor). However, I was curious as to what happens if a person has a
different energy effect hit them while they are lightly poisoned (while
"missing energy" due to poison failure).</font></font></div>
<div><font face="arial">Lastly, I have a magic question. In
increasing Spell ELs, the formula is Casting Cost x (EL+3). Is this for
the new level or the current level. (Ex. BMC =1, EL =0. Casting cost at
0 is 1, is increase 3, or is it 12 for CC3 (EL1) and x 4 (EL1 +3))</font><font
face="arial"><br>
</font><br>
<b><i>Sylverrs_ dragon <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:abnaric@HOTMAIL.COM"><abnaric@HOTMAIL.COM></a></i></b> wrote:</div>
<blockquote class="replbq"
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px;">Though
it brings a blush, I never gave this question much consideration. I<br>
will give it some thought before formulating a real reply. Definite
facts to<br>
consider are that unless there is something physically wrong with an<br>
individual, he should recover from being knocked out within a few
minutes or<br>
hours. I also do not see that the fact of being subdued should have any<br>
major long term effects other than any real damage inflicted with it.
It may<br>
be best to use a W + St type roll. Will think on it.<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>